Boeing’s 787 Dreamliner in the Hot Seat Over ‘Shoddy Production and Weak Oversight’

Apr 21, 2019

This post contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. Terms apply to the offers listed on this page. For an explanation of our Advertising Policy, visit this page.

One of the toughest jobs on the planet at the moment has to be handling public relations for Boeing. In the wake of the Lion Air crash, the Ethiopian Airlines crash less than six months later, and the worldwide grounding of the Boeing 737 MAX fleet, it’s been nearly nonstop bad news for the company. Today, the New York Times published a new report about Boeing’s 787 Dreamliner that will make that job even tougher.

The report, which is based on “hundreds of pages of internal emails, corporate documents and federal records, as well as interview with more than a dozen current and former employees,” focuses on Boeing’s North Charleston, SC, plant, which is one of two locations where Boeing produces the 787 Dreamliner (the other being Everett, WA). The Times’ investigation of Boeing “reveals a culture that often valued production speed over quality.” Facing delays and massive cost overruns since even the early days of the 787 program, Boeing “pushed its work force to quickly turn out Dreamliners, at times ignoring issues raised by employees.”

Joseph Clayton, a former technician, went on record to say he told his wife that he never plans to fly on the Dreamliner. “It’s just a safety issue,” Clayton said.

The Times’ article isn’t the first indication that something might have been amiss at Boeing’s North Charleston factory. Qatar Airways stopped accepting aircraft built in the South Carolina plant after receiving damaged planes and delayed deliveries.

In addition, the United States Air Force has twice now stopped taking deliveries of the KC-46 Pegasus, which is based on Boeing’s 767 and built at the Everett plant. The military cited issues with foreign object debris, or FOD, meaning any foreign objects in the aircraft that could potentially cause damage, as the main issue. Debris can range from something as tiny as metal shavings to larger items like wrenches, bolts or other tools and parts.

Rich Mester, a pre-delivery review technician with Boeing, told the Times his FOD sightings included tubes of sealant, nuts and “stuff from the build process.” While FOD is a fairly common issue in the manufacturing of aircraft, objects are usually removed during detailed inspections.

John Barnett, a former quality manager who worked at Boeing for nearly 30 years, routinely discovered metal slivers hanging over the wiring that commands the Dreamliner flight controls. If the sharp metal pieces were to penetrate the wires, he said, it could be “catastrophic.” Barnett said he “urged his bosses to remove the shavings” but that they refused and instead relocated him within the factory.

TPG obtained an email that was sent out to all employees from Brad Zaback, the 787 vice president and general manager, in response to the article in the Times. Zaback told employees that the story “paints a skewed and inaccurate picture of the program and of our team here at Boeing South Carolina.” He went on to say that the article featured “distorted information, rehashing old stories and rumors that have long ago been put to rest.”

According to Zaback, Boeing gave the Times the opportunity to tour the Charleston plant, but the Times “declined this invitation.”

PR nightmare aside, it would seem that Boeing’s customers are still backing the aviation giant. American Airlines spokesperson Ross Feinstein issued a statement saying, “We have confidence in the 787s we have in our fleet.” In addition, Norwegian Airlines said, “We are very satisfied with the quality and reliability of all 33 of our Dreamliners, regardless of where they have been assembled.”

For the latest travel news, deals and points and miles tips please subscribe to The Points Guy daily email newsletter.

Featured photo by Boeing

Chase Sapphire Preferred® Card

WELCOME OFFER: 80,000 Points


CARD HIGHLIGHTS: 2X points on all travel and dining, points transferrable to over a dozen travel partners

*Bonus value is an estimated value calculated by TPG and not the card issuer. View our latest valuations here.

Apply Now
More Things to Know
  • Earn 80,000 bonus points after you spend $4,000 on purchases in the first 3 months from account opening. That's $1,000 when you redeem through Chase Ultimate Rewards®. Plus earn up to $50 in statement credits towards grocery store purchases within your first year of account opening.
  • Earn 2X points on dining including eligible delivery services, takeout and dining out and travel. Plus, earn 1 point per dollar spent on all other purchases.
  • Get 25% more value when you redeem for airfare, hotels, car rentals and cruises through Chase Ultimate Rewards®. For example, 80,000 points are worth $1,000 toward travel.
  • With Pay Yourself Back℠, your points are worth 25% more during the current offer when you redeem them for statement credits against existing purchases in select, rotating categories.
  • Get unlimited deliveries with a $0 delivery fee and reduced service fees on eligible orders over $12 for a minimum of one year with DashPass, DoorDash's subscription service. Activate by 12/31/21.
  • Count on Trip Cancellation/Interruption Insurance, Auto Rental Collision Damage Waiver, Lost Luggage Insurance and more.
  • Get up to $60 back on an eligible Peloton Digital or All-Access Membership through 12/31/2021, and get full access to their workout library through the Peloton app, including cardio, running, strength, yoga, and more. Take classes using a phone, tablet, or TV. No fitness equipment is required.
Regular APR
15.99%-22.99% Variable
Annual Fee
Balance Transfer Fee
Either $5 or 5% of the amount of each transfer, whichever is greater.
Recommended Credit

Editorial Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are the author’s alone, not those of any bank, credit card issuer, airlines or hotel chain, and have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any of these entities.

Disclaimer: The responses below are not provided or commissioned by the bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by the bank advertiser. It is not the bank advertiser’s responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.