United Airlines expects little to no impact from Boeing 787 manufacturing issues
This post contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. Terms apply to the offers listed on this page. For an explanation of our Advertising Policy, visit this page.
United Airlines anticipates little or no impact on flights from the latest manufacturing issues plaguing Boeing’s 787 Dreamliner jets.
Two separate issues related to the rear section of the jet’s fuselage — or “aft body” as Boeing puts it — and the tail, or horizontal stabilizer, are not expected to “have much or any impact” on United’s operations, spokesperson Josh Earnest said Thursday.
The Chicago-based carrier has parked one 787 following the discovery of the two separate fuselage issues. However, with United flying less than a third of its normal international schedule, the move has not affected travelers.
United flew 57 787s at the end of August, according to Boeing data. It is one of the largest operators of the Dreamliner globally.
Sign up for TPG’s free new biweekly Aviation newsletter for more airline news!
Earnest’s comments come a day after Boeing confirmed an issue with the manufacturing of 787 tails. Certain stabilizer components were “clamped together during the build process with greater force than specified,” Boeing spokesperson Jessica Kowal told TPG. This resulted in “non-conformance” with specifications and could result in the “pre-mature aging” of the parts.
The planemaker estimates that roughly 893 787s — more than 90% of the 981 Dreamliners delivered — could be impacted by the stabilizer issue, she said.
Kowal emphasized that the Dreamliner is safe and the stabilizer issue is, as she put it, “not an immediate safety of flight issue.” The planemaker is making necessary corrections to assembled but not-yet-delivered 787s and is assessing whether a fix to delivered jets is needed.
Related: Boeing delays 777X, 737 MAX timeline as COVID hits business
The stabilizer issue follows the two rear fuselage concerns that first came to light a year ago. One issue is related to “shims” — or the material used to fill gaps between sections of fuselage — where the rear section joins another, and a separate concern regarding the “flatness” of certain mould lines, said Kowal.
While neither issue alone constitutes a safety concern, the two issues together resulted in eight 787s being pulled from service in August. These include the United jet, as well as ones delivered to Air Canada and Singapore Airlines.
“We take safety and quality very seriously,” said Kowal.
Related: FAA move could have Boeing 737 MAX flying again this fall
The 787 fuselage and stabilizer issues — while separate and none alone considered a safety issue — come at a time of heightened focus on Boeing. The 737 MAX remains grounded a year and a half after two fatal crashes took the lives of 346 people. The grounding has prompted a reworking of the certain flight control systems on the jet, as well as an in-depth review of the certification process.
“The concern, however, is more about each issue separately and its reflection on Boeing’s Quality Manufacturing System (QMS). Principally that the QMS didn’t catch the errors,” wrote The Air Current editor-in-chief Jon Ostrower on the 787 issues on Sept. 8.
Boeing has pushed to reduce the number of inspectors on staff in favor of the automated QMS system, according to Ostrower. This comes even as the planemaker has faced repeated examinations by regulators of its manufacturing processes, especially at its assembly line in North Charleston, South Carolina.
The latest 787 quality concerns could delay the delivery of new jets as Boeing corrects the stabilizer issue. However, as yet, the only affected in-service planes are the eight already pulled from service.
Related: United sees Boeing 787 as new long-haul ‘workhorse,’ orders 7 more Dreamliners
Featured image by Nicolas Economou/NurPhoto via Getty Images.
Sign-up Successful!
Welcome to The Points Guy!
WELCOME OFFER: 80,000 Points
TPG'S BONUS VALUATION*: $1,650
CARD HIGHLIGHTS: 2X points on all travel and dining, points transferrable to over a dozen travel partners
*Bonus value is an estimated value calculated by TPG and not the card issuer. View our latest valuations here.
- Earn 80,000 bonus points after you spend $4,000 on purchases in the first 3 months from account opening. That's $1,000 when you redeem through Chase Ultimate Rewards®. Plus earn up to $50 in statement credits towards grocery store purchases within your first year of account opening.
- Earn 2X points on dining including eligible delivery services, takeout and dining out and travel. Plus, earn 1 point per dollar spent on all other purchases.
- Get 25% more value when you redeem for airfare, hotels, car rentals and cruises through Chase Ultimate Rewards®. For example, 80,000 points are worth $1,000 toward travel.
- With Pay Yourself Back℠, your points are worth 25% more during the current offer when you redeem them for statement credits against existing purchases in select, rotating categories.
- Get unlimited deliveries with a $0 delivery fee and reduced service fees on eligible orders over $12 for a minimum of one year with DashPass, DoorDash's subscription service. Activate by 12/31/21.
- Count on Trip Cancellation/Interruption Insurance, Auto Rental Collision Damage Waiver, Lost Luggage Insurance and more.
- Get up to $60 back on an eligible Peloton Digital or All-Access Membership through 12/31/2021, and get full access to their workout library through the Peloton app, including cardio, running, strength, yoga, and more. Take classes using a phone, tablet, or TV. No fitness equipment is required.
Disclaimer: The responses below are not provided or commissioned by the bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by the bank advertiser. It is not the bank advertiser’s responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.
Editorial Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are the author’s alone, not those of any bank, credit card issuer, airlines or hotel chain, and have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any of these entities.