This post contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our Advertising Policy, visit this page.

Former Air Canada Altitude Super Elite traveler Eric Wong is elite no more. And he’s suing Air Canada because of it.

Wong, an IT consultant who frequently travels across the United States, Canada, Europe and Asia for his job, has consistently flown enough to earn top elite status with Air Canada since 2012, a status conferred on travelers who annually fly more than 100,000 miles with the airline. Wong also is a points and miles enthusiast who participated in Air Canada’s “Earn Your Wings” promotion, which helped him earn collectible badges, bonus miles and additional perks that made him a high-profile Air Canada passenger.

But these factors weren’t enough to help Wong maintain his Super Elite status after a travel change in 2016 resulted in a confrontation with Air Canada agents. (The nature of Wong’s work often requires last-minute changes and cancellations to his travel plans.) On January 10, 2016, Wong notified an Air Canada agent that he no longer wished to travel on his upcoming flight. The problem was that Wong did so in the Maple Leaf lounge at Vancouver International Airport (YVR), which can only be accessed after passing security and clearing Canada’s customs and immigration. This meant that, despite Wong’s Super Elite airline status which entitled him to a full refund on last-minute cancellations “with no questions asked,” an Air Canada agent would have to escort him out of the secure area in accordance with border security requirements.

According to Wong’s lawsuit, the situation began to escalate as the customer service agent “insisted, in a stern manner, that Mr. Wong provide a reason for his change of travel plans,” then required him to wait in the lounge while she “investigated ‘abuses’ allegedly committed by the Plaintiff, and made numerous telephone calls and conducted computer terminal searches” investigating Wong’s previous Air Canada travel records. Wong finally was escorted out of the lounge and airport. But 10 days later, Air Canada notified Wong that his Altitude Super Elite status had been indefinitely suspended because he had “cleared security and accessed the international or trans-border sterile areas of the airport, possibly without the purpose of traveling” — a statement that Wong’s lawsuit called “false, untrue, and incorrect.”

Wong filed the suit on June 19, 2018, with the Vancouver Registry of the Supreme Court of British Columbia, after two years of appealing for Air Canada to reinstate his status proved futile. In his claim, Wong referenced several occasions in 2015 where he had had to make similar last-minute changes to his flight after clearing customs, with no issues from either airline personnel or from customs agents. Wong also asserted that, contrary to Air Canada’s allegations that he “failed to travel to the United States” after clearing customs, he boarded a later flight back to the US that day on another carrier.

The suit not only alleges that Air Canada wrongfully revoked Wong’s status, but references a number of instances where he found himself subjected to additional screening from the airline:

  • On June 18, 2016, Air Canada employees escorted Wong off of a flight from Vancouver for Victoria after he had already boarded with several friends, detaining him while Air Canada employees ‘scrutinized his identification.’ Wong eventually was allowed to re-board the plane, but not until he had experienced ‘humiliation in front of fellow passengers, including his friends.’
  • On June 20, 2016, Wong was detained at the reception desk of the Maple Leaf Lounge in Vancouver while the customer service agent spoke to corporate security ‘because of an extraordinary alert that appeared on a computer screen when the service agent entered the Plaintiff’s Aeroplan number.’ Once again, Wong was allowed to enter after some time, but also ‘not without some embarrassment and delay.’
  • On June 27, 2016, Wong was once again detained at the Vancouver Maple Leaf Lounge reception desk. Despite holding a business-class ticket on United Airlines, which should have granted him access to the Star Alliance partner lounge, Wong was denied entry at the Maple Leaf Lounge, according to the suit.

“Because of the way Mr. Wong has been treated, and what was said to him, by Air Canada personnel after they have accessed Air Canada computer records while dealing with him, it is apparent that the Air Canada computer records contain something negative about him in the context of ‘security,'” the suit states.

“It’s not as if he was seen with explosives or something like that, but they treat everything as if it’s a threat to security,” said Wong’s lawyer, Don Sorochan. “And if you end up in an argument with them, you’re liable to get arrested.”

Wong is suing for breach of contract and negligence, alleging that the airline’s “surveillance and monitoring” of his online and offline activities is intended to justify Air Canada’s “high-handed actions.”

Wong’s situation has led to significant discussion amongst elite travelers, since the ramifications of this case can have long-lasting repercussions for frequent flyers. While none of Wong’s allegations have yet been proven in court, FlyerTalk forum member “canadiancow” stated that he had been part of Wong’s travel party on June 18, 2016, when Wong was escorted off of the Air Canada flight to Victoria: “I remember that. @philelite remembers that. I can’t recall who else was there, but there were a few of us. It was absolutely ridiculous. We had all boarded, they came on, and told Mr. Wong he had to get off and go with them. A few minutes later, they came to collect his jacket from the overhead bin.”

“canadiancow” also mentioned another incident where Wong was denied access: “Then there was the time I tried to guest him into the YVR domestic MLL after we flew, in business class, YYZ-YVR, which I am fully entitled to do as a Super Elite. Nope. Supervisor got called, and the end result was ‘Mr. Kennedy, you can enter. Mr. Wong, you cannot.’ Wasted 20 minutes of my time and was extremely frustrating. That was actually a denial of one of my advertised Super Elite benefits.”

Featured image courtesy of Air Canada.

The best beginner points and miles card out there.
Chase Sapphire Preferred® Card

With great travel benefits, 2x points on travel & dining and a 50,000 point sign up bonus, the Chase Sapphire Preferred is a great card for those looking to get into the points and miles game. Here are the top 5 reasons it should be in your wallet, or read our definitive review for more details.

Apply Now
More Things to Know
  • Earn 50,000 bonus points after you spend $4,000 on purchases in the first 3 months from account opening. That's $625 toward travel when you redeem through Chase Ultimate Rewards®
  • Chase Sapphire Preferred® named a 'Best Travel Credit Card' by MONEY® Magazine, 2016-2017
  • 2X points on travel and dining at restaurants worldwide & 1 point per dollar spent on all other purchases.
  • Earn 5,000 bonus points after you add the first authorized user and make a purchase in the first 3 months from account opening
  • No foreign transaction fees
  • 1:1 point transfer to leading airline and hotel loyalty programs
  • Get 25% more value when you redeem for travel through Chase Ultimate Rewards. For example, 50,000 points are worth $625 toward travel.
  • No blackout dates or travel restrictions - as long as there's a seat on the flight, you can book it through Chase Ultimate Rewards
Intro APR on Purchases
N/A
Regular APR
17.74% - 24.74% Variable
Annual Fee
$0 Intro for the First Year, then $95
Balance Transfer Fee
Either $5 or 5% of the amount of each transfer, whichever is greater.
Recommended Credit
Excellent Credit

Editorial Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are author’s alone, not those of any bank, credit card issuer, airlines or hotel chain, and have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any of these entities.

Disclaimer: The responses below are not provided or commissioned by the bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by the bank advertiser. It is not the bank advertiser’s responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.