Commerce Department Sides with Boeing, Confirms 300% Tariff on CSeries

Dec 21, 2017

This post contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. Terms apply to the offers listed on this page. For an explanation of our Advertising Policy, visit this page.

This week, Boeing vs. Bombardier/Delta completed another round of fighting. And again, this round went to Boeing. Delta flyers have a vested interest in this battle, as a ruling in Boeing’s favor would surely cause Delta to cancel its order for 75 CS100s — a plane you’ll love thanks its massive overhead bins, larger windows and large seat width. Delta has already insisted that it won’t pay the tariff.

In a ruling Wednesday, the US Commerce Department confirmed its proposed 300% tariff ruling on all Bombardier CSeries aircraft sold to US buyers. This tariff was the result of a Boeing complaint of price dumping and illegal subsidies from the Canadian government to the Canadian aircraft manufacturer Bombardier.

Boeing asserts that Delta was able to order 75 CS100s for $20 million each vs. the list price of $33 million. It’s industry practice that large discounts are given for large aircraft orders and to orders from early customers of a new aircraft type.

Thankfully for Bombardier/Airbus, Delta and Delta flyers, this isn’t the final ruling. The proposed tariff now goes to the International Trade Commission to determine if Boeing was truly harmed by alleged price dumping and Canadian subsidies. The ITC is expected to rule in January or February 2018, which will be the critical ruling. The Commence Department has confirmed “the investigations will be terminated and no orders will be issued” if the ITC rules against the tariffs.

No matter the final ruling, Boeing may have done major damage to its relationship with Delta by pursuing this complaint. And it may have already led Delta to place a major order with Boeing’s competitor, Airbus.

Delays of Delta CS100 Deliveries

Delta's livery for the C Series (photo: Bombardier)
Delta’s livery for the CSeries. Photo courtesy of Bombardier.

Deliveries of CS100s to Delta were scheduled to begin in early 2018, but the tariff ruling is delaying the start of these deliveries. And it might be a while before we see a Delta CSeries aircraft.

In the announcement of Airbus taking a majority stake in the CSeries program, Bombardier and Airbus unveiled a plan to assemble CSeries aircraft for US customers at a new line in Alabama. This was presumably being done to try to avoid application of tariffs to the aircraft.

In testimony this week, it was unveiled that Delta and Bombardier are renegotiating the contract for Delta’s 75 CS100s. Bombardier officials noted that Delta is asking the company to guarantee that its planes would be assembled at this new line.

If that’s worked into the contract, Delta flyers are going to have to wait a while to enjoy a new CSeries aircraft. Presumably Bombardier/Airbus aren’t going to begin construction on a $300 million new assembly line in Mobile unless the ITC strikes down the tariffs. Then, it’s going to take at least two years before the new line is ready to start producing aircraft.

Impact on Boeing/Canada relations

Boeing’s illegal subsidy complaint is coming around to bite the company’s order book. As a result of Boeing continuing its complaint, Canada made good on its promise to cancel orders for 18 new F/A-18 Super Hornets. The cancellation of this $5.23 billion order deals Boeing a major setback. In response to the announcement Boeing bemoaned:

Although we will not have the opportunity to grow our supply base, industrial partnerships and jobs in Canada the way we would if Canada purchased new Super Hornets, we will continue to look to find productive ways to work together in the future.

With that order cancelled, Canada put out a call to aircraft manufacturers for bids for 88 new fighter jets. In the announcement, Procurement Minister Carla Qualtrough shot back:

The evaluation of bids will also include an assessment of bidders impact on Canada’s economic interest. When bids are assessed, this will mean that bidders responsible for harming Canada’s economic interest will be at a distinct disadvantage compared to bidders who aren’t engaged in detrimental behavior.

Shots fired. That statement makes it clear that Boeing won’t be in the running for any new orders as long as it continues its trade complaint.

What’s your take on the Boeing vs. Bombardier/Delta fight?

Chase Sapphire Preferred® Card

WELCOME OFFER: 80,000 Points


CARD HIGHLIGHTS: 3X points on dining and 2x points on travel, points transferrable to over a dozen travel partners

*Bonus value is an estimated value calculated by TPG and not the card issuer. View our latest valuations here.

Apply Now
More Things to Know
  • Earn 80,000 bonus points after you spend $4,000 on purchases in the first 3 months from account opening. That's $1,000 when you redeem through Chase Ultimate Rewards®.
  • Enjoy benefits such as a $50 annual Ultimate Rewards Hotel Credit, 5x on travel purchased through Chase Ultimate Rewards®, 3x on dining and 2x on all other travel purchases, plus more.
  • Get 25% more value when you redeem for airfare, hotels, car rentals and cruises through Chase Ultimate Rewards®. For example, 80,000 points are worth $1,000 toward travel.
  • With Pay Yourself Back℠, your points are worth 25% more during the current offer when you redeem them for statement credits against existing purchases in select, rotating categories
  • Count on Trip Cancellation/Interruption Insurance, Auto Rental Collision Damage Waiver, Lost Luggage Insurance and more.
Regular APR
16.24% - 23.24% Variable
Annual Fee
Balance Transfer Fee
Either $5 or 5% of the amount of each transfer, whichever is greater.
Recommended Credit

Editorial Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are the author’s alone, not those of any bank, credit card issuer, airlines or hotel chain, and have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any of these entities.

Disclaimer: The responses below are not provided or commissioned by the bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by the bank advertiser. It is not the bank advertiser’s responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.