Skip to content

Why Spirit Airlines Hopes to Never See 90% or Better On-Time Arrivals

July 01, 2016
4 min read
Why Spirit Airlines Hopes to Never See 90% or Better On-Time Arrivals
This post contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. Terms apply to the offers listed on this page. For an explanation of our Advertising Policy, visit this page.

It’s hardly a secret that Spirit Airlines is America's most hated airline. Rest assured that Spirit’s semi-new CEO, Bob Fornaro, has heard your gripes about poor customer service, hidden fees and late or cancelled flights, and wants to improve the airline’s reputation and performance — but only up to a certain point.

While that might seem like the expected response from the face of a company that is regularly accused of being detached when it comes to dealing with its customers, Fornaro’s goal of doing just enough to not be considered “the” most hated airline is actually pretty strategic, according to a recent Bloomberg article, at least if the company wants to continue to operate successfully in the low-cost carrier space.

Since being named Spirit’s CEO in January, Fornaro’s main focus has been on improving reliability — going so far as to incentivize company executives by doubling the weight that on-time rates carry when it comes to calculating bonuses (from 10 to 20 percent). Already, there have been signs of improvement: In April, Spirit had an on-time rate of 73.8 percent, up from an average of 68 percent, yet still nearly 11 percent below the national airline average.

According to Bloomberg, Fornaro’s plans for improving reliability include reducing the use of its Airbus planes to allow for more flexibility, hiring more staff to help eliminate overtime costs, purchasing more planes so a single cancelled flight doesn’t wreak havoc on the airline's entire schedule and making sure that the first flight of the day gets out on time, thus improving the chance that those that follow will, too.

But he isn’t expecting change to happen overnight. “If we were able to in one quarter make a dramatic improvement, it would be 'all pad and all gloss,'” Fornaro told stockholders in April, explaining why the airline would never pad its schedule. “It just simply is paying more money to show a good performance without fundamentally turning the airplanes any faster.”

“Paying more money” is exactly why, according to Bloomberg, Fornaro does not expect — or want — to compete with bigger brands like Delta, Alaska, or Hawaiian Airlines, which regularly log on-time rates of 90 percent or higher. To get to that level would require that more time be allotted for each flight and that on-the-ground operations be perfectly coordinated, which can be an expensive proposition for any airline, particularly a low-cost one.

Your bag must be this small to ride. Ugh. Image courtesy of Shutterstock.
Your bag must be this small to ride. Ugh. Image courtesy of Shutterstock.

In other words: efficiency is expensive. And that’s not the “Home of the Bare Fare” way. Sure, Spirit is happy to charge you $10 to have an agent print out your boarding pass, but they know there’s only so far they can push those hated fees. Which makes striking a balance between price and promptness an important question for every airline to figure out for itself, as there’s no one-size-fits-all answer.

For Spirit, that means letting the bigger airlines — namely Delta, American and United — duke it out for the industry’s superlatives. Fornaro and his fellow Spirit powers-that-be “never want to be number one in on-time.” He does, however, want to be the tops in pricing. Fornaro also understands that a little friendliness can go a long way toward building customer loyalty.

“There is a big change in terms of focusing on our operations,” Fornaro told The New York Times. “This is how we want to be viewed: on time, friendly, clean and efficient.”

Sign up for our daily newsletter

It’s a huge challenge, but some industry insiders believe that Fornaro — who spent more than a decade running AirTran — could be the person to turn the company around. “They have a big problem: Many people try Spirit because they’re attracted to the low fare, but then they don’t come back,” Julie Yates, an airline analyst at Credit Suisse, told The New York Times. “Bob is softening the overall approach to be more friendly. Over time, that should help them retain more customers.”

For his part, Fornaro told Bloomberg that he expects to see 75 to 80 percent of Spirit’s flights operating on-time by the end of this year. “Next year at this time we’re going to run a very reliable operation,” he promised. Which doesn’t mean that you still won’t be paying $2 to print your boarding pass at the airport kiosk.

We want to know: What do you think of Spirit Airlines? Sound off below!

H/T: Bloomberg

Featured image by Image courtesy of Spirit Airlines.