Why You Won’t Be Flying Russian or Chinese Planes Soon
This post contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. Terms apply to the offers listed on this page. For an explanation of our Advertising Policy, visit this page.
Boeing and Airbus. Embraer and Bombardier.
A large chunk of aircraft manufacturing is dominated by duopolies.
And even within the duopolies, competition is limited. Despite the prolonged grounding of the 737 MAX, the prevailing wisdom is that Boeing’s single-aisle bestseller will recover, if nothing else because Airbus is sold out for years, leaving nowhere to buy competing planes.
But is there truly no other place to buy commercial passenger aircraft?
For the answer, look first at smaller jets that seat up to about 110 people, a space where Embraer and Bombardier produce most of the world’s fleets. And look, more precisely, at Houston and San Antonio, where once a day in each place, according to ch-aviation schedule data, a flight takes off on a plane not made by those two small-jet manufacturers.
Those flights — one from each airport, both to Monterrey, Mexico and both painted in the livery of the Mexican low-cost airline InterJet — are on Russian-built Sukhoi Superjet 100s, or SSJ100s. They are the only two regularly scheduled flights from the US on non-Western aircraft.
The InterJet SSJ100s, however, offer strong evidence that Embraer and Bombardier, nor Boeing and Airbus, have nothing to fear in the near term. Quite the contrary: More SSJs would surely be flying in the US if not for the fact that 16 of InterJet’s 21 SSJs are grounded because of reliability and maintenance issues, according to ch-aviation fleet data.
Russia’s United Aircraft Corporation has struggled to sell SSJs outside its home region and InterJet’s experience won’t do anything to change that. Even Russia’s Aeroflot, presumably with access to some of the best SSJ maintenance expertise, struggles to keep its SSJs in the air. Thomas Jaeger, ch-aviation’s CEO, cites data showing that Aeroflot’s SSJs fly an average of just five hours per day, compared to nearly nine for KLM’s similarly-sized fleet of Embraer jets.
But could a non-Western manufacturer ever compete effectively against Boeing and Airbus, as well as Embraer and Bombardier? Could China, Russia or Japan design and build planes that can break up the duopolies? Those are the three countries where manufacturers are taking orders for new jets that aren’t made in the West.
Japan’s Mitsubishi is marketing the Mitsubishi Regional Jet, or MRJ, in two variants: the MRJ70 and MRJ90, designed to compete roughly against Embraer’s E170 through E190 and Bombardier’s CRJ700 and CRJ900.
China’s state-owned Comac offers not only the 78-seat ARJ21-700 but, more interestingly, the C919, designed to compete against the A320neo and 737 MAX.
And Russia’s Irkut, which shares a state-owned parent company with Sukhoi, offers the MS-21, also a 320/737 competitor.
All three manufacturers have gotten many (in Mitsubishi’s case) or most (in Comac’s and Irkut’s cases) of their orders from airlines in their home markets, no doubt a result of government prodding to support local industry. But their stories diverge when it comes to orders from the West.
The MRJ features new geared turbofan engines from Pratt & Whitney, similar to the ones on the wildly popular A320neo family and the up-and-coming A220. Mitsubishi generated orders for no fewer than 150 MRJs from two US regional airlines, SkyWest and Trans States. However, those orders began coming in a decade ago, when passengers were expected to be flying on the planes by 2015, a projection that has slid to 2020. There’s also a major question of whether US airlines will ever be able to fly them, because of a need to renegotiate pilot contracts at airlines like American, Delta and United. Without a new contract, those airlines may not be able to permit SkyWest and Trans States to operate MRJs on their behalf.
Comac and Irkut have taken orders for 305 C919s and 175 MS-21s (sometimes written MC-21, from the Cyrillic alphabet). But not a single one of those is destined for an airline in North America or Europe.
Why does Mitsubishi, despite ongoing delays and other issues, still have Western airline orders for 150 units on its books, while Comac and Irkut have none? “That probably can be attributed to the fact that there generally is a higher level of trust in Japanese rather than Russian and Chinese engineering in the Western world,” Jaeger, the CEO of ch-aviation, said recently.
Can either manufacturer change that?
Not anytime soon, said Richard Aboulafia, vice president of analysis at Teal Group, an aviation consultancy. Between the two, he gives better odds to Comac, partly because “no one watching InterJet and Superjet is thinking warm, fuzzy thoughts,” he said. Other issues related to geopolitics, such as sanctions on Russia, would also make it difficult for many Western airlines to order MS-21s even if they wanted them, he noted.
Comac — whose C919s look a lot like A320s, some of which are assembled in China — had the better opportunity but has largely squandered it, according to Aboulafia, because of two big missteps. First, the production of the airframe itself involved too much vertical integration, counting almost entirely on Chinese suppliers. Second, foreign suppliers have been reluctant to work on the project anyway because of inadequate guarantees of intellectual property protection. Non-Chinese firms make the plane’s engines and onboard electronics.
Another fact that probably won’t inspire confidence in Comac: The manufacturer’s smaller ARJ21, already in service with Chengdu Airlines, seems to be even less reliable than the beleaguered SSJ, according to Jaeger. How could Comac change that?
“Once we see 100-plus Comac aircraft forming part of the mainline fleets [of Chinese airlines] delivering similar performance to comparable Western aircraft, they will be taken seriously outside China,” Jaeger said.
And what about the plight of the 737 MAX? Could that push otherwise-reluctant airlines into the embrace of Comac, if not Irkut?
“This is a long-term game,” Aboulafia said. “If we’re still talking about the MAX in a year, then yes. But I have a strong feeling we won’t be.”
Still, in the very long term, anything’s possible.
Drawing on Embraer’s history, Jaeger said, “If I would tell you today that there is a new Brazilian aircraft manufacturer and they will sell their aircraft all over the world in five years, you would consider me crazy as well. If Irkut, Comac and Mitsubishi manage to do well where Sukhoi has struggled, there is no reason why in 25 years you would not see them compete on a global scale.”
Featured image of an Irkut MC-21-300 by Vladimir Baikalsky/TASS via Getty Images
WELCOME OFFER: 60,000 Points
TPG'S BONUS VALUATION*: $1,200
CARD HIGHLIGHTS: 2X points on all travel and dining, points transferrable to over a dozen travel partners
*Bonus value is an estimated value calculated by TPG and not the card issuer. View our latest valuations here.
- Earn 60,000 bonus points after you spend $4,000 on purchases in the first 3 months from account opening. That's $750 toward travel when you redeem through Chase Ultimate Rewards®
- 2X points on travel and dining at restaurants worldwide & 1 point per dollar spent on all other purchases.
- Get 25% more value when you redeem for airfare, hotels, car rentals and cruises through Chase Ultimate Rewards. For example, 60,000 points are worth $750 toward travel