This post contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our Advertising Policy, visit this page.

Step one: Develop the world’s leading series of regional jets.

Step two: Design a brand new series of aircraft, paint it with a tiger livery and name it “The Profit Hunter”.

Step three: Profit!

It may not be quite so easy for Embraer, but they’re giving it a go with their shiny second generation E-jets, called the E2.

Tiger Livery on the E195-E2. Image via Embraer.
Tiger Livery on the E195-E2. Image via Embraer.

 

2018 will be revealing for the program. Embraer and its main competitor Bombardier are now battling head to head for buyers worldwide for their 100+ seat twinjets, the E2 and C Series, respectively. They aren’t the 100-seaters you may know from your regional flights today; thanks largely to more fuel-efficient engines, they can go really far, and offer much better economics in terms of cost per seat.

Aircraft in this category, for example, could allow British Airways to fly an all-business class flight between JFK and London’s City Airport, replacing the Airbus A318. “That is an eye opening capability for an airliner,” said Henry Harteveldt, a leading airline-industry expert. “When selling a product, you want the market to chase you; you don’t want to chase the market. That’s what I like about both the E2-195 and the CS300. You can combine realistic capacity with range, and get very creative,” he said.

I recently spoke about the E2 program with Rodrigo Silva e Souza, Marketing VP at Embraer Commercial Aviation, and separately with Richard Aboulafia and Harteveldt, noted industry experts.

Souza, a 21-year Embraer veteran, holds no punches when it comes to Bombardier’s alternative.

“We built the most efficient single-aisle aircraft on the market. If we thought composite wings were more efficient, we would have built them.”

Embraer Marketing VP Rodrigo Souza

Middle-Seat Haters Rejoice — and an Innovative Business Class Concept

Readers will be familiar with the existing editions of the E-Jet: the E175 (a true regional jet carrying 76 passengers, operated by the regional carriers of United, Delta and American) and the E190 (with around 100 passengers, operated by JetBlue and Air Canada).

The E2 will feature three variants: the E175-E2, E190-E2 and E195-E2. They each seat between 76 and 134 passengers, and fly between 2,000 and 2,800 nautical miles. (By comparison, a typical Boeing 737 will seat around 160 passengers.)

As my colleagues have noted after flying the delivery legs of the new E2 the cabin feels larger than the existing E190, which Souza compares to an all-business class design. The economy seat pitch chosen by Norway’s Widerøe is a tight 29 inches. However, there’s never been a middle seat on the E-Jets, which is an advantage for passengers. (In contrast, Bombardier’s C Series is laid out 3-2 in economy with a 19-inch wide middle seat.)

An E2 that can accommodate 100 passengers can also accommodate 100 roller bags. On a recent flight, a TPG reviewer immediately noticed the better overhead bin space. The E-Jets eliminate the annoying aluminum spar between the seat in front of passengers, allowing for better leg room and even enough room for an additional roller.

The cabin does have an all-business class feel, with unique staggered seats in business. Image via Embraer.
The cabin does have an all-business class feel, with unique staggered seats in business. Image via Embraer.

 

The best innovation? Business class can be configured to have staggered seats in a 2-2 layout seen above, which allows for more privacy for business passengers without sacrificing many seats. I personally will be excited not to have to pole-vault over my business class companion on a regional jet. The seats look exceedingly comfortable and the layout just might allow a businessperson to get some work done on the flight. (A little pull-up screen would do wonders for privacy.) Widerøe did not choose this layout for its planes, but I hope any US carriers ordering the plane will.

Reception of the staggered concept will be passenger-subjective. Harteveldt, the airline industry expert, was not as convinced of the merits. “Credit to Embraer and their design partners to be creative and innovative here. But it seems convoluted and tortuous,” he said.

A better view of the staggered layout. Image by Zach Honig / The Points Guy

A Technological Advantage

The E2 is already an impressive aircraft, building on years of Embraer’s expertise and lessons learned. “Embraer had enough material with their existing jets,” said Richard Aboulafia, vice president of analysis at US aviation consultancy firm Teal Group. “They could move gently here. And this is a very efficient machine. The E2 is well-positioned.”

Embraer predicts 17.3% better fuel economy than the original E190 (largely, but not solely, courtesy of Pratt & Whitney’s PurePower PW1000G geared turbofan engines). It boasts redesigned, larger aluminum wings than on the original E-Jets (allowing for more efficiency, carrying more fuel, and longer range).

In contrast, Bombardier highlights its composite wings for the C Series, the first of its kind for a single-aisle aircraft. Embraer doesn’t think its jet needs them. “We built the most efficient single-aisle aircraft on the market. If we thought composite wings were more efficient, we would have built them,” Souza said. Composites are lighter than aluminum, which is why the Boeing 787, for example, is largely made out of them.

But Souza said that for a flight between one and two hours where most of these planes will be employed, there is not much benefit in a composite wing. “We built a wing that has a lower maintenance risk and weighs less than our competitor. So what would be the point of a composite wing? Coming from the CRJ, I think they [Bombardier] needed to show something new and different.”

Nevertheless, Delta selected the C Series to replace its Boeing 717s. And JetBlue has openly mused about the engine maintenance issues that plagued the E190, prompting the airline to review the fleet as part of a broader cost-savings initiative. While no US carriers have signed on to purchase the E2, Widerøe, the Norwegian carrier, recently took delivery of three E190-E2 jets.

I asked Embraer’s Souza if a fleet planner at an airline (and JetBlue more precisely) would hold Embraer to account for the engine maintenance challenges they faced with the E190.

“The E190 had issues just like any other new program,” he said. “And for the development of E2, the obstacles we faced are now a strength. With the E2, we know all of the issues of the E1. We’ve addressed all of them with this design. Keep in mind, we had over 500 requests from our 70 airline partners. That’s an incredible database of knowledge for us,” Souza said.

“…We are responsible for the entire aircraft. And we stand behind our product.”

“Some customers had complaints, some didn’t, but we are responsible for the entire aircraft. And we stand behind our product,” Souza said.

“For our customers, the E2 is a solid offer. We are not making promises. We are not dreaming. Unlike our competitors who have zero experience with their new plane, we have concrete data to back it up.”

The E2 up in the air. Image courtesy of Embraer.
The E2 up in the air. Image courtesy of Embraer.

 

JetBlue is the perfect case for the E2, he said, noting that training a pilot on the new platform takes two-and-half days, compared to 25 to 30 days for a new platform. This is a distinct advantage, as pilots are already in short supply. A JetBlue pilot currently flying the E190 could conceivably fly the E2 version in a heartbeat.

The impact of the combination between Bombardier and Airbus, and the possible union of Embraer and Boeing remains to be seen.
Said industry analyst Richard Aboulafia: “Both Bombardier and Embraer have always been hobbled by high manufacturing costs. With their combination, Airbus can now bring significant supply chain savings to Bombardier. Embraer knows this. The barbarians are at the gate.”

The answer will come soon. The Farnborough Air Show, traditionally the venue where a lot of aircraft orders are announced, is in mid-July. That’s where we will likely see which airlines want to ride the Profit Hunter.

TPG contributor Mike Arnot is the founder of Boarding Pass NYC, a New York-based travel brand, and a private pilot.

The best beginner points and miles card out there.
Chase Sapphire Preferred® Card

With great travel benefits, 2x points on travel & dining and a 50,000 point sign up bonus, the Chase Sapphire Preferred is a great card for those looking to get into the points and miles game. Here are the top 5 reasons it should be in your wallet, or read our definitive review for more details.

Apply Now
More Things to Know
  • Earn 50,000 bonus points after you spend $4,000 on purchases in the first 3 months from account opening. That's $625 toward travel when you redeem through Chase Ultimate Rewards®
  • Chase Sapphire Preferred® named a 'Best Travel Credit Card' by MONEY® Magazine, 2016-2017
  • 2X points on travel and dining at restaurants worldwide & 1 point per dollar spent on all other purchases.
  • Earn 5,000 bonus points after you add the first authorized user and make a purchase in the first 3 months from account opening
  • No foreign transaction fees
  • 1:1 point transfer to leading airline and hotel loyalty programs
  • Get 25% more value when you redeem for travel through Chase Ultimate Rewards. For example, 50,000 points are worth $625 toward travel.
  • No blackout dates or travel restrictions - as long as there's a seat on the flight, you can book it through Chase Ultimate Rewards
Intro APR on Purchases
N/A
Regular APR
17.49% - 24.49% Variable
Annual Fee
$0 Intro for the First Year, then $95
Balance Transfer Fee
Either $5 or 5% of the amount of each transfer, whichever is greater.
Recommended Credit
Excellent Credit

Editorial Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are author’s alone, not those of any bank, credit card issuer, airlines or hotel chain, and have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any of these entities.

Disclaimer: The responses below are not provided or commissioned by the bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by the bank advertiser. It is not the bank advertiser’s responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.