This post contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an explanation of our Advertising Policy, visit this page.
Screeners and security personnel working for the Transportation Security Administration can’t be sued for false arrests, abuse or even assault, a federal appeals court ruled Wednesday.
In a 2-1 decision, the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit said that TSA officials are shielded under the federal statute that gives federal employees what’s known as sovereign immunity when acting in their official functions. That law, the Federal Tort Claims Act, doesn’t provide cover for law enforcement, however. In its decision, the Third Circuit ruled that TSA screeners aren’t considered law enforcement, and thus aren’t exempted from FTCA protections.
The case, Pellegrino v. the United States of America Transportation Security Administration, arose from a 2006 incident in which Florida business consultant Nadine Pellegrino spent 18 hours in jail after a contentious screening by TSA officers at Philadelphia Airport (PHL) that ended with her being arrested and charged with assault and making threats. Pellegrino later sued the TSA and the individual officials involved for $951,200, accusing the agents of damage to property, malicious prosecution, emotional distress and false imprisonment. The parties settled one claim of property damage outside of court, but a federal district court sided with the TSA on all the other claims and wouldn’t let the case proceed to trial.
The Third Circuit reiterated the lower court’s decision Wednesday, and said that TSA officers conduct “administrative searches,” not searches related to criminal investigations, meaning that they get the full protection from lawsuits afforded by the FTCA.
“For most people, TSA screenings are an unavoidable feature of flying, and they may involve thorough searches of not only the belongings of passengers but also their physical persons — searches that are even more rigorous and intimate for individuals who happen to be selected for physical pat-downs,” Circuit Judge Cheryl Ann Krause wrote in the decision.
But they still don’t meet the level of lifting the immunity afforded federal employees by law, she concluded: “Congress to date has limited the proviso to ‘investigative or law enforcement officers,’ and [transportation security officers] do not meet that definition.”
In his dissent, Circuit Judge Thomas Ambro argued that the TSA’s physical searches have become invasive enough that they should be considered on par with searches of criminal suspects. He said that Pellegrino’s lawsuit should be allowed to go to a civil trial.
Pellegrino’s attorney didn’t return calls for comment Wednesday, and it’s unclear whether she will seek to appeal the ruling.
Featured photo by ROBYN BECK/AFP/Getty Images
Know before you go.
News and deals straight to your inbox every day.
NEW INCREASED OFFER: 60,000 Points
TPG'S BONUS VALUATION*: $1,200
CARD HIGHLIGHTS: 2X points on all travel and dining, points transferrable to over a dozen travel partners
*Bonus value is an estimated value calculated by TPG and not the card issuer. View our latest valuations here.
- Earn 60,000 bonus points after you spend $4,000 on purchases in the first 3 months from account opening. That's $750 toward travel when you redeem through Chase Ultimate Rewards®
- 2X points on travel and dining at restaurants worldwide & 1 point per dollar spent on all other purchases.
- Get 25% more value when you redeem for airfare, hotels, car rentals and cruises through Chase Ultimate Rewards. For example, 60,000 points are worth $750 toward travel