Two Injured in Possible Drone Incident With Porter Airlines Plane

Nov 15, 2016

This post contains references to products from one or more of our advertisers. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. Terms apply to the offers listed on this page. For an explanation of our Advertising Policy, visit this page.

Although drones can be fun devices — especially for filmmakers and techies — they can pose a threat to aircraft. Yesterday, the Transportation Safety Board of Canada announced that it was deploying a team to investigate a recent incident between a Porter Airlines aircraft and a possible drone in which two crew members were injured.

Porter Airlines Flight 204, which was bound for Billy Bishop Airport (YTZ), was approaching the airport when the pilots had to make drastic maneuvers in order to avoid a low-flying object. Initially, the pilots believed it could have been a balloon, but later said that it could have been a drone. As a result of the jerking motion, two flight attendants suffered minor injures.

This incident brings up the ongoing debate of how to monitor drone usage in commercial airspace — specifically low-flying drones that can interfere with planes as they approach the runway. The US already requires drone owners to register their devices with federal authorities in hopes that people would be more responsible in how they use their drones. As a result of this incident, the Air Line Pilots Association, Canada wants our neighbors up north to follow suit. It still remains unclear how, if at all, the government or airports will monitor drone usage within commercial airspace, but a few options are being considered.

H/T: Engadget

Featured image courtesy of David Cooper via Getty Images.

Editorial Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are the author’s alone, not those of any bank, credit card issuer, airlines or hotel chain, and have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any of these entities.

Disclaimer: The responses below are not provided or commissioned by the bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by the bank advertiser. It is not the bank advertiser’s responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.